🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents supported the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.